False discovery rate smoothing
Tansey, Koyejo, Poldrack, Scott · stat.ME,stat.AP,stat.CO · 2016-11-14 · 原文
We present false discovery rate smoothing, an empirical-Bayes method for exploiting spatial structure in large multiple-testing problems. FDR smoothing automatically finds spatially localized regions of significant test statistics. It then relaxes the threshold of statistical significance within these regions, and tightens it elsewhere, in a manner that controls the overall false-discovery rate at a given level. This results in increased power and cleaner spatial separation of signals from noise. The approach requires solving a non-standard high-dimensional optimization problem, for which an efficient augmented-Lagrangian algorithm is presented. In simulation studies, FDR smoothing exhibits state-of-the-art performance at modest computational cost. In particular, it is shown to be far more robust than existing methods for spatially dependent multiple testing. We also apply the method to a data set from an fMRI experiment on spatial working memory, where it detects patterns that are much more biologically plausible than those detected by standard FDR-controlling methods. All code for FDR smoothing is publicly available in Python and R.
讲义
讲义·推断 依据「原文」自动生成的结构化摘要（推断），非原文表述；以原文为准。
1. 人话版
We present false discovery rate smoothing, an empirical-Bayes method for exploiting spatial structure in large multiple-testing problems.
FDR smoothing automatically finds spatially localized regions of significant test statistics.
2. 领域脉络
本文类目：stat.ME、stat.AP、stat.CO，属于其所在研究脉络的最新进展。
3. 机制拆解
It then relaxes the threshold of statistical significance within these regions, and tightens it elsewhere, in a manner that controls the overall false-discovery rate at a given level.
This results in increased power and cleaner spatial separation of signals from noise.
The approach requires solving a non-standard high-dimensional optimization problem, for which an efficient augmented-Lagrangian algorithm is presented.
4. 证据与数字
摘要未给出量化结果——留意原文的实验与数据。
5. 反例与边界
摘要未声明局限与反例——这是需要警惕的信号，精读时先问边界。
6. 跨领域连接与意外收获
横跨 3 个类目（stat.ME、stat.AP、stat.CO），关注其在你兴趣板块间的迁移面。
7. 可复用方法
把本文机制与你手头项目对照，找一个两周内能验证的最小实验。
8. 术语表
精读时把不熟的术语记入此处，作为下次回忆的锚点。