ADP 前沿学习

← 板块一 · 研究前沿

Probabilistic Omnidirectional Path Loss Models for Millimeter-Wave Outdoor Communications

Samimi, Rappaport, MacCartney · cs.IT,math.IT · 2015-06-22 · 原文

This letter presents a probabilistic omnidirectional millimeter-wave path loss model based on real-world 28 GHz and 73 GHz measurements collected in New York City. The probabilistic path loss approach uses a free space line-of-sight propagation model, and for non-line-of-sight conditions uses either a close-in free space reference distance path loss model or a floating-intercept path loss model. The probabilistic model employs a weighting function that specifies the line-of-sight probability for a given transmitter-receiver separation distance. Results show that the probabilistic path loss model offers virtually identical results whether one uses a non-line-of-sight close-in free space reference distance path loss model, with a reference distance of 1 meter, or a floating-intercept path loss model. This letter also shows that site-specific environmental information may be used to yield the probabilistic weighting function for choosing between line-of-sight and non-line-of-sight conditions.

🔮 让 ChatGPT 全网深度追问

讲义

讲义·推断 依据「原文」自动生成的结构化摘要(推断),非原文表述;以原文为准。

1. 人话版

This letter presents a probabilistic omnidirectional millimeter-wave path loss model based on real-world 28 GHz and 73 GHz measurements collected in New York City.

The probabilistic path loss approach uses a free space line-of-sight propagation model, and for non-line-of-sight conditions uses either a close-in free space reference distance path loss model or a floating-intercept path loss model.

2. 领域脉络

本文类目:cs.IT、math.IT,属于其所在研究脉络的最新进展。

3. 机制拆解

The probabilistic model employs a weighting function that specifies the line-of-sight probability for a given transmitter-receiver separation distance.

This letter also shows that site-specific environmental information may be used to yield the probabilistic weighting function for choosing between line-of-sight and non-line-of-sight conditions.

4. 证据与数字

Results show that the probabilistic path loss model offers virtually identical results whether one uses a non-line-of-sight close-in free space reference distance path loss model, with a reference distance of 1 meter, or a floating-intercept path loss model.

5. 反例与边界

摘要未声明局限与反例——这是需要警惕的信号,精读时先问边界。

6. 跨领域连接与意外收获

横跨 2 个类目(cs.IT、math.IT),关注其在你兴趣板块间的迁移面。

7. 可复用方法

把本文机制与你手头项目对照,找一个两周内能验证的最小实验。

8. 术语表

精读时把不熟的术语记入此处,作为下次回忆的锚点。