Network inference in the non-equilibrium steady state
Dettmer, Nguyen, Berg · cond-mat.stat-mech,cond-mat.dis-nn · 2016-07-26 · 原文
Non-equilibrium systems lack an explicit characterisation of their steady state like the Boltzmann distribution for equilibrium systems. This has drastic consequences for the inference of parameters of a model when its dynamics lacks detailed balance. Such non-equilibrium systems occur naturally in applications like neural networks or gene regulatory networks. Here, we focus on the paradigmatic asymmetric Ising model and show that we can learn its parameters from independent samples of the non-equilibrium steady state. We present both an exact inference algorithm and a computationally more efficient, approximate algorithm for weak interactions based on a systematic expansion around mean-field theory. Obtaining expressions for magnetisations, two- and three-point spin correlations, we establish that these observables are sufficient to infer the model parameters. Further, we discuss the symmetries characterising the different orders of the expansion around the mean field and show how different types of dynamics can be distinguished on the basis of samples from the non-equilibrium steady state.
讲义
讲义·推断 依据「原文」自动生成的结构化摘要（推断），非原文表述；以原文为准。
1. 人话版
Non-equilibrium systems lack an explicit characterisation of their steady state like the Boltzmann distribution for equilibrium systems.
This has drastic consequences for the inference of parameters of a model when its dynamics lacks detailed balance.
2. 领域脉络
本文类目：cond-mat.stat-mech、cond-mat.dis-nn，属于其所在研究脉络的最新进展。
3. 机制拆解
Such non-equilibrium systems occur naturally in applications like neural networks or gene regulatory networks.
Here, we focus on the paradigmatic asymmetric Ising model and show that we can learn its parameters from independent samples of the non-equilibrium steady state.
We present both an exact inference algorithm and a computationally more efficient, approximate algorithm for weak interactions based on a systematic expansion around mean-field theory.
4. 证据与数字
摘要未给出量化结果——留意原文的实验与数据。
5. 反例与边界
摘要未声明局限与反例——这是需要警惕的信号，精读时先问边界。
6. 跨领域连接与意外收获
横跨 2 个类目（cond-mat.stat-mech、cond-mat.dis-nn），关注其在你兴趣板块间的迁移面。
7. 可复用方法
把本文机制与你手头项目对照，找一个两周内能验证的最小实验。
8. 术语表
精读时把不熟的术语记入此处，作为下次回忆的锚点。