Cohesion and Coalition Formation in the European Parliament: Roll-Call Votes and Twitter Activities
Cherepnalkoski, Karpf, Mozetic, Grcar · cs.CL,cs.CY,cs.SI · 2016-10-14 · 原文
We study the cohesion within and the coalitions between political groups in the Eighth European Parliament (2014--2019) by analyzing two entirely different aspects of the behavior of the Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) in the policy-making processes. On one hand, we analyze their co-voting patterns and, on the other, their retweeting behavior. We make use of two diverse datasets in the analysis. The first one is the roll-call vote dataset, where cohesion is regarded as the tendency to co-vote within a group, and a coalition is formed when the members of several groups exhibit a high degree of co-voting agreement on a subject. The second dataset comes from Twitter; it captures the retweeting (i.e., endorsing) behavior of the MEPs and implies cohesion (retweets within the same group) and coalitions (retweets between groups) from a completely different perspective. We employ two different methodologies to analyze the cohesion and coalitions. The first one is based on Krippendorff's Alpha reliability, used to measure the agreement between raters in data-analysis scenarios, and the second one is based on Exponential Random Graph Models, often used in social-network analysis. W
讲义
讲义·推断 依据「原文」自动生成的结构化摘要（推断），非原文表述；以原文为准。
1. 人话版
We study the cohesion within and the coalitions between political groups in the Eighth European Parliament (2014--2019) by analyzing two entirely different aspects of the behavior of the Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) in the policy-making processes.
On one hand, we analyze their co-voting patterns and, on the other, their retweeting behavior.
2. 领域脉络
本文类目：cs.CL、cs.CY、cs.SI，属于其所在研究脉络的最新进展。
3. 机制拆解
We make use of two diverse datasets in the analysis.
The first one is the roll-call vote dataset, where cohesion is regarded as the tendency to co-vote within a group, and a coalition is formed when the members of several groups exhibit a high degree of co-voting agreement on a subject.
The second dataset comes from Twitter; it captures the retweeting (i.e., endorsing) behavior of the MEPs and implies cohesion (retweets within the same group) and coalitions (retweets between groups) from a completely different perspective.
4. 证据与数字
摘要未给出量化结果——留意原文的实验与数据。
5. 反例与边界
摘要未声明局限与反例——这是需要警惕的信号，精读时先问边界。
6. 跨领域连接与意外收获
横跨 3 个类目（cs.CL、cs.CY、cs.SI），关注其在你兴趣板块间的迁移面。
7. 可复用方法
把本文机制与你手头项目对照，找一个两周内能验证的最小实验。
8. 术语表
精读时把不熟的术语记入此处，作为下次回忆的锚点。