ADP 前沿学习

← 板块一 · 研究前沿

On the \mathcal{NP}-hardness of GRacSim Drawing and k-SEFE Problems

Grilli · cs.CG,cs.CC · 2016-11-13 · 原文

We study the complexity of two problems in simultaneous graph drawing. The first problem, GRacSim Drawing, asks for finding a simultaneous geometric embedding of two graphs such that only crossings at right angles are allowed. The second problem, k-SEFE, is a restricted version of the topological simultaneous embedding with fixed edges (SEFE) problem, for two planar graphs, in which every private edge may receive at most k crossings, where k is a prescribed positive integer. We show that GRacSim Drawing is \mathcal{NP}-hard and that k-SEFE is \mathcal{NP}-complete. The \mathcal{NP}-hardness of both problems is proved using two similar reductions from 3-Partition.

🔮 让 ChatGPT 全网深度追问

讲义

讲义·推断 依据「原文」自动生成的结构化摘要(推断),非原文表述;以原文为准。

1. 人话版

We study the complexity of two problems in simultaneous graph drawing.

The first problem, GRacSim Drawing, asks for finding a simultaneous geometric embedding of two graphs such that only crossings at right angles are allowed.

2. 领域脉络

本文类目:cs.CG、cs.CC,属于其所在研究脉络的最新进展。

3. 机制拆解

The second problem, k-SEFE, is a restricted version of the topological simultaneous embedding with fixed edges (SEFE) problem, for two planar graphs, in which every private edge may receive at most k crossings, where k is a prescribed positive integer.

We show that GRacSim Drawing is \mathcal{NP}-hard and that k-SEFE is \mathcal{NP}-complete.

4. 证据与数字

The \mathcal{NP}-hardness of both problems is proved using two similar reductions from 3-Partition.

5. 反例与边界

摘要未声明局限与反例——这是需要警惕的信号,精读时先问边界。

6. 跨领域连接与意外收获

横跨 2 个类目(cs.CG、cs.CC),关注其在你兴趣板块间的迁移面。

7. 可复用方法

把本文机制与你手头项目对照,找一个两周内能验证的最小实验。

8. 术语表

精读时把不熟的术语记入此处,作为下次回忆的锚点。