The Emergence of Social Science of Large Language Models
Jia, Zhao · cs.AI · 2026-09-05 · 原文
The social science of large language models (LLMs) examines how these systems evoke mind attributions, interact with one another, and transform human activity and institutions. We conducted a systematic review of 270 studies, combining text embeddings, unsupervised clustering and topic modeling to build a computational taxonomy. Three domains emerge organically across the reviewed literature. LLM as Social Minds examines whether and when models display behaviors that elicit attributions of cognition, morality and bias, while addressing challenges such as test leakage and surface cues. LLM Societies examines multi-agent settings where interaction protocols, architectures and mechanism design shape coordination, norms, institutions and collective epistemic processes. LLM-Human Interactions examines how LLMs reshape tasks, learning, trust, work and governance, and how risks arise at the human-AI interface. This taxonomy provides a reproducible map of a fragmented field, clarifies evidentiary standards across levels of analysis, and highlights opportunities for cumulative progress in the social science of artificial intelligence.
讲义
讲义·推断 依据「原文」自动生成的结构化摘要（推断），非原文表述；以原文为准。
1. 人话版
The social science of large language models (LLMs) examines how these systems evoke mind attributions, interact with one another, and transform human activity and institutions.
We conducted a systematic review of 270 studies, combining text embeddings, unsupervised clustering and topic modeling to build a computational taxonomy.
2. 领域脉络
本文类目：cs.AI，属于其所在研究脉络的最新进展。
3. 机制拆解
Three domains emerge organically across the reviewed literature.
LLM Societies examines multi-agent settings where interaction protocols, architectures and mechanism design shape coordination, norms, institutions and collective epistemic processes.
4. 证据与数字
摘要未给出量化结果——留意原文的实验与数据。
5. 反例与边界
LLM as Social Minds examines whether and when models display behaviors that elicit attributions of cognition, morality and bias, while addressing challenges such as test leakage and surface cues.
6. 跨领域连接与意外收获
思考本文机制能否迁移到你正在跟进的问题。
7. 可复用方法
把本文机制与你手头项目对照，找一个两周内能验证的最小实验。
8. 术语表
精读时把不熟的术语记入此处，作为下次回忆的锚点。