Monocular Visual Odometry without Calibration or Test-time Optimization
Yugay, Nguyen, Gevers, Snoek, Oswald · cs.CV · 2026-09-05 · 原文
The most accurate monocular visual odometry systems require known camera intrinsics, refine their estimates with test-time optimization, and recover trajectories only up to an unknown factor. Systems built on large 3D models need no intrinsics, but they remain considerably less accurate and slower for odometry. Direct pose regression avoids all these requirements, yet it has not matched either approach's accuracy. We revisit this formulation with a transformer that predicts relative camera poses together with separate rotation and translation confidences over overlapping image windows, supervised by camera poses alone. A confidence-weighted module then aggregates the overlapping predictions into a single trajectory. The resulting method, CalfVO, needs no intrinsics, no bundle adjustment, and no loop closure, and it recovers scale from learned priors, accurately enough that it is evaluated without any alignment to the ground truth. Across five benchmarks, it is the most accurate calibration-free method on every metric we report, and it runs at 53 FPS, faster than every baseline.
讲义
讲义·推断 依据「原文」自动生成的结构化摘要（推断），非原文表述；以原文为准。
1. 人话版
The most accurate monocular visual odometry systems require known camera intrinsics, refine their estimates with test-time optimization, and recover trajectories only up to an unknown factor.
Systems built on large 3D models need no intrinsics, but they remain considerably less accurate and slower for odometry.
2. 领域脉络
本文类目：cs.CV，属于其所在研究脉络的最新进展。
3. 机制拆解
Direct pose regression avoids all these requirements, yet it has not matched either approach's accuracy.
We revisit this formulation with a transformer that predicts relative camera poses together with separate rotation and translation confidences over overlapping image windows, supervised by camera poses alone.
A confidence-weighted module then aggregates the overlapping predictions into a single trajectory.
4. 证据与数字
Across five benchmarks, it is the most accurate calibration-free method on every metric we report, and it runs at 53 FPS, faster than every baseline.
5. 反例与边界
摘要未声明局限与反例——这是需要警惕的信号，精读时先问边界。
6. 跨领域连接与意外收获
思考本文机制能否迁移到你正在跟进的问题。
7. 可复用方法
把本文机制与你手头项目对照，找一个两周内能验证的最小实验。
8. 术语表
精读时把不熟的术语记入此处，作为下次回忆的锚点。