Machine Learning for Scheduling Decision Systems: A Critical Review of Architecture, Assurance, and Deployment
Liu, Lin, Chen, Wu, Shen · math.OC · 2026-09-05 · 原文
Machine learning supports scheduling through prediction, search guidance, or schedule formation, but model-level evaluations obscure the downstream work, technical authority, and controls needed to release decisions. We conduct a critical integrative review combining structured candidate identification and purposive full-text synthesis, treating the complete reported scheduling decision system (from problem specification to release and conditional recovery) as the unit of analysis. Our system-level taxonomy distinguishes the function of learned outputs, schedule formation, and binding control along the normal release path. It separates learning and adaptation from decision assurance, and technical authority from organizational decision rights. Reported timing and solver guarantees depend on downstream work and the decision space left after learned commitments; transfer of retained capability differs from architectural reuse, and operational maturity from automated release. Evidence supports selected quality-computation-time trade-offs, bounded transfer of retained capability, performance within specified regimes, and operating use in several configurations. It does not support a sy
讲义
讲义·推断 依据「原文」自动生成的结构化摘要（推断），非原文表述；以原文为准。
1. 人话版
Machine learning supports scheduling through prediction, search guidance, or schedule formation, but model-level evaluations obscure the downstream work, technical authority, and controls needed to release decisions.
We conduct a critical integrative review combining structured candidate identification and purposive full-text synthesis, treating the complete reported scheduling decision system (from problem specification to release and conditional recovery) as the unit of analysis.
2. 领域脉络
本文类目：math.OC，属于其所在研究脉络的最新进展。
3. 机制拆解
Our system-level taxonomy distinguishes the function of learned outputs, schedule formation, and binding control along the normal release path.
It separates learning and adaptation from decision assurance, and technical authority from organizational decision rights.
Reported timing and solver guarantees depend on downstream work and the decision space left after learned commitments; transfer of retained capability differs from architectural reuse, and operational maturity from automated release.
4. 证据与数字
摘要未给出量化结果——留意原文的实验与数据。
5. 反例与边界
摘要未声明局限与反例——这是需要警惕的信号，精读时先问边界。
6. 跨领域连接与意外收获
思考本文机制能否迁移到你正在跟进的问题。
7. 可复用方法
把本文机制与你手头项目对照，找一个两周内能验证的最小实验。
8. 术语表
精读时把不熟的术语记入此处，作为下次回忆的锚点。