ADP 前沿学习

← 板块一 · 研究前沿

Citation Impact and Public Attention Analysis of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Research in the Urological Literature

· 2026-09-04 · 原文

DOI:10.64898/2026.09.01.26361260v1?rss=1预印本:medRxiv开放获取:绿色OA

Objective: To determine whether the most cited and the most publicly discussed benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) literature describe the same body of work, and whether clinicians and patients read different evidence. Methods: Four Boolean Web of Science searches and four matched Altmetric Explorer searches were run in February 2024, restricted to literature indexed with urologic terminology, and screened in duplicate. Two arms were assembled: the 50 most-cited articles (citation census May 2024) and the 50 with the highest Altmetric Attention Scores. Funding source and intervention focus were hand-coded from the full text of all 100 articles; open-access status came from Unpaywall. Arms were compared with Mann-Whitney U and Fisher exact tests Results: Eight of 50 articles (16%) appeared i

🔮 让 ChatGPT 全网深度追问

讲义

讲义·推断 依据「原文」自动生成的结构化摘要(推断),非原文表述;以原文为准。

1. 人话版

Objective: To determine whether the most cited and the most publicly discussed benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) literature describe the same body of work, and whether clinicians and patients read different evidence.

Methods: Four Boolean Web of Science searches and four matched Altmetric Explorer searches were run in February 2024, restricted to literature indexed with urologic terminology, and screened in duplicate.

2. 领域脉络

来源板块:板块一 · 研究前沿。

3. 机制拆解

摘要未展开方法细节——精读时重点看方法/模型部分。

4. 证据与数字

Two arms were assembled: the 50 most-cited articles (citation census May 2024) and the 50 with the highest Altmetric Attention Scores.

Funding source and intervention focus were hand-coded from the full text of all 100 articles; open-access status came from Unpaywall.

Arms were compared with Mann-Whitney U and Fisher exact tests Results: Eight of 50 articles (16%) appeared i

5. 反例与边界

摘要未声明局限与反例——这是需要警惕的信号,精读时先问边界。

6. 跨领域连接与意外收获

思考本文机制能否迁移到你正在跟进的问题。

7. 可复用方法

把本文机制与你手头项目对照,找一个两周内能验证的最小实验。

8. 术语表

精读时把不熟的术语记入此处,作为下次回忆的锚点。