Prognosis of 1st time revision due to pain following primary total hip arthroplasty - a nationwide cohort study from the Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register
· 2026-09-10 · 原文
DOI：10.64898/2026.09.09.26361766v1?rss=1
Revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) for persistent or unexplained pain remains controversial. Uncertainty remains regarding the subsequent risk of re-revision following revision THA for pain. The objectives of this study are to compare the risk of all-cause and cause-specific re-revision following first-time revision THA performed for pain versus aseptic loosening. This nationwide, register-based cohort study will use data from the Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register. Patients who underwent primary THA followed by first-time revision THA for pain or aseptic loosening between 1995 and 2025 will be included. Patients will be followed from the index revision until re-revision, death, emigration, or end of follow-up. The primary outcome is time to all-cause re-revision. Secondary outcomes are c
讲义
讲义·推断 依据「原文」自动生成的结构化摘要（推断），非原文表述；以原文为准。
1. 人话版
Revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) for persistent or unexplained pain remains controversial.
Uncertainty remains regarding the subsequent risk of re-revision following revision THA for pain.
2. 领域脉络
The objectives of this study are to compare the risk of all-cause and cause-specific re-revision following first-time revision THA performed for pain versus aseptic loosening.
3. 机制拆解
This nationwide, register-based cohort study will use data from the Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register.
4. 证据与数字
Patients who underwent primary THA followed by first-time revision THA for pain or aseptic loosening between 1995 and 2025 will be included.
5. 反例与边界
摘要未声明局限与反例——这是需要警惕的信号，精读时先问边界。
6. 跨领域连接与意外收获
思考本文机制能否迁移到你正在跟进的问题。
7. 可复用方法
把本文机制与你手头项目对照，找一个两周内能验证的最小实验。
8. 术语表
精读时把不熟的术语记入此处，作为下次回忆的锚点。